English: View of Capitol Hill from the U.S. Supreme Court Česky: Pohled na Kapitol z budovy Nejvyššího soudu Spojených států (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
A recent New York Times op ed piece by Judy Nicastro tells the wrenching story of an abortion she had at 23 weeks.
The decision — which involved aborting a fetus that would have faced only suffering if it survived — was made after agonizing weeks. It was informed by sonograms, an M.R.I., tests, studies and extensive discussions between Nicastro, her husband and many medical professionals.
The decision to tell her story was prompted by the House vote on June 18 to ban abortion after 22 weeks. No one among those who voted for the bill (which is not expected to pass the Senate) has experienced anything like the agonizing struggle Nicastro and her husband went through, or even just a troubled pregnancy — most of the votes were cast by men, after all.
The decision was anguished, soul-searching, unique — and above all, private.
Which raises the question:
Should a decision about an unintended or unadvised pregnancy be made by the woman involved, with advice from medical professionals, after discussion with her partner, in consideration of the unique circumstances that apply?
Or by the U.S. Congress?
Filed under: Uncategorized Tagged: Abortion, abortion rights, Judy Nicastro, new york times, Nicastro, Reproductive health, Reproductive rights, Republican, Senate, U.S. House, United States Congress
